For children and adolescents, the shelter-in-place experience likely resulted in a variety of social-emotional behavior (SEB) reactions. Many students probably felt some initial sense of relief—even excitement—at the prospect of being away from the routines and challenges of school. However,…
While there are many unknowns for next school year, one thing is certain: there’s great importance in screening all of your students this upcoming fall regardless of where and how instruction is provided.
Universal screening in schools is similar to taking your child to the doctor for regular well-child visits. Physicians know the typical growth that infants and children should be making as they grow, and well-child visits give parents and their care providers an opportunity to address any differences observed between a child’s actual and expected height, weight, and other health variables.
In the same way, teachers can use school-based screening data to compare a child’s academic and behavior data with school-based expectations for learning. Such screening is even more important now because learning has been disrupted for most students. In addition, the combination of flat growth or decline from spring 2020 disruption along with the typical summer loss means that the best starting place for fall instruction might not be where you had started instruction in the past.
Universal screening data will help teachers know what instruction students need as the school year begins.
This spring, learning has shifted primarily in three ways.
Some schools have completely closed and teachers are no longer working with students, while others have adapted to a model in which attendance is optional and work is ungraded. And a few schools are still operating on a familiar schedule where attendance is expected and work is graded.
In any case, formative assessment is as important as ever. When teachers can’t be in the same room as the students, having access to key data to determine student needs is really essential.
But how does this happen in a virtual learning environment?
You may discover that screening data is really valuable at identifying students whose learning has plateaued so that you can act now to prevent any further slide.
In this post, we’ll offer some thoughts on how you can use spring screening data to identify students who may need additional support, and then discuss strategies to engage students whose learning appears to have plateaued.
This article was originally posted on the Illuminate Education blog on April 16th, 2020.
Best practices are constantly evolving for special education teachers. However, in December 2019, nobody could have predicted what April 2020 would look like. Districts and educators had to flip their standard practices overnight to accommodate the current state of the nation due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Not only did it bring significant challenges to students in general education, but it also brought many questions around how to ensure students with IEPs have equal access to education—not to mention the additional services these students receive.
Schools are increasingly tasked to be providers of mental and behavioral health services while concurrently implementing social-emotional learning (SEL) curricula. But measuring both has proved to be a challenge. Social-emotional and behavior screening is one such method that schools have used to provide timely data to inform early intervention efforts and schoolwide data to evaluate the efficacy of universal programming. However, some schools struggle with how to initiate universal screening and where to focus limited resources. Oftentimes, a primary barrier to beginning the screening process is agreeing upon the primary domain of interest.
In other words, should schools be assessing behavior, mental health, SEL, or all three?
Progress monitoring is a widespread practice in K12 schools across the country and for good reason! By collecting frequent data about a student’s progress toward a specific learning goal, teachers can keep tabs on how well an intervention is working and make changes as needed. However, despite the widespread acceptance and general use of progress monitoring several myths about the practice still persist.
Below, with accurate information that will hopefully encourage even the biggest skeptic to view progress monitoring in a new light, I’ve debunked the 10 most common myths I hear about progress monitoring.